Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00455 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00455, Dkt. No. 64
Decided
September 26, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting 12 Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of California
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court, defendant Nike, Inc., moves to transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the Northern District of California (“NDCA”) or in the alternative to the District of Oregon. Dkt. No. 12. Having considered the motion, it is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Cellspin Soft, Inc. (“Cellspin”) filed its Complaint on November 23, 2022 asserting U.S. Patent Nos. 8,738,794; 8,892,752; a nd 9,749,847 (“the Asserted Patents”) against numerous Nike products referred to collectively as “Nike Adapt Wearable.” The instant Motion, Dkt. No.