Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

UltimatePointer, L.L.C. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00406 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00406, Dkt. No. 42
Decided
August 25, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 25 Motion to Dismiss. The Court further orders that the stay it previously placed in this case is lifted in accordance with the Order staying the case (Dkt. No. 21)
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff UltimatePointer L.L.C.’s (“Ultimate Pointer”) Complaint for Failure to State a Plausible Claim for Relief by Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “LG”) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 25.) In the Motion, LG requests that the Court dismiss UltimatePointer’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Id. at 1.) I. BACKGROUND UltimatePointer filed a complaint on October 18, 2022, alleging that LG infringed U.S. Patent No. 11,402,927 (the “’927 Patent”).