Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership D/B/A Verizon Wireless, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00394 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00394, Dkt. No. 297
Decided
September 30, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 291 MOTION for New Trial Defendants Motion and Memorandum in Support of Their Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial filed by Verizon Business Global, LLC, Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc., Verizon Online, LLC, …
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Business Global LLC, Verizon Business Network Services LLC, Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc., Verizon Data Services LLC, and Verizon Online LLC ’s (collectively, “Verizon” or “Defendants”) Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial (“the Motion”). (Dkt. No. 291.) Having carefully considered the Motion, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. I.