Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

NextGen Innovations, LLC v. Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00307 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00307, Dkt. No. 375
Decided
March 12, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 103, 123, 190
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are several motions. First, Defendants’1 Motion for Entry of Model Order Focusing Patent Claims and Prior Art, Dkt. No. 123. Second, Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions, Dkt. No. 103. Third, Defendants’ Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions, Dkt. No. 190. For the following reasons, the motions are DENIED. I. LEGAL STANDARD Under the Local Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Texas , a party's invalidity contentions are final, subject to a few exceptions. P.R. 3-6(a).