Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arigna Technology Limited v. Nissan Motor Co Ltd et al, No. 2:22-cv-00297 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00297, Dkt. No. 1
Decided
August 3, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting 54 Motion for Severance from case 2:22-cv-126. Court GRANTS the motion. Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is directed to SEVER Defendants Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Nissan North America, Inc., Tesla, Inc., Tesla Mot…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Severance (Dkt. No. 54) filed by Defendants Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.; Nissan North America, Inc.; Tesla, Inc.; Tesla Motors TX, Inc.; Toyota Motor Corporation; Toyota Motor North America, Inc. ; and General Motors LLC (collectively, the “Vehicle Defendants”); as well as Continental AG; Conti Temic Microelectronic GmbH; and ADC Automotive Distance Control Systems GmbH (collectively, “Continental”). On July 19, 2022, the Court heard arguments on the Motion.