Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology Texas, LLC et al, No. 2:22-cv-00294 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00294, Dkt. No. 97
Decided
April 18, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 80 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of Second Supplemental Expert Report of Matthew Lynde filed by Netlist, Inc., 79 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Strike Portions of Second Supplem…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.’s (“Netlist”) Motion for Leave to File Motion to Strike (the “Motion for Leave”) and its Motion to Strike Portions of Second Supplemental Report of Dr. Matthew Lynde (the “Motion to Strike”). (Dkt. Nos. 79 and 80.) In the motions, Netlist requests that the Court strike “new theories, assertions, and opinions that did not appear in [Dr. Lynde’s] original report.” (Dkt. No.