Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd et al, No. 2:22-cv-00293 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2023)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00293, Dkt. No. 228
Decided
November 21, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
37 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In these consolidated patent cases, Netlist alleges infringement by Samsung and Micron (and their affiliates) (together, “Defendants”) of claims from four patents related to computer memory—U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912 (the “’912 Patent”); 9,858,215 (the “’215 Patent”); 10,268,608 (the “’608 Patent”); and 11,093,417 (the “’417 Patent”). The parties present ten dis- putes1 about the proper construction of claim terms from th e patents.