Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Nokia of America Corporation v. Broadcom Corp. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 21, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 1
Decided
July 21, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER severed from Civil Action 2:21cv310
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc., and Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd.’s (collectively, “Broadcom”) Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 114). Having considered the Motion, the related briefing, and the relevant authorities, the Court concludes that the Motion should be DENIED. Additionally, before the Court are Broadcom’s Opposed Motion to Enter Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 178); Broadcom’s Opposed Motion to Enter Amended Discovery Over (Dkt. No.