Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Agis Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00263 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2023)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00263, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
April 8, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 39 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(B)(6) filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court, defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) move to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. 39. For the following reasons, the motion should be DENIED. Plaintiff AGIS Software Development, LLC filed suit against Samsung alleging infringement of US Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“ ‘970 patent”); 9,467,838 (“ ‘838 patent”); 9,749,829 (“ ‘829 patent”); and 9,820,123 (“ ‘123 patent”). The ‘970 patent is generally directed to communication networks for forced message alert. Id. (Abstract).