Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

NetSocket, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00172 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00172, Dkt. No. 126
Decided
March 15, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 91 OPPOSED MOTION to Compel filed by NetSocket, Inc
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff NetSocket, Inc.’s (“NetSocket”) Motion to Compel Discovery (the “Motion to Compel”). (Dkt. No. 91.) In the Motion to Compel, NetSocket requests that Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) be compelled to (1) produce source code used in Cisco SD-WAN, Viptela SD- WAN, Cisco Meraki, StarOS, Cisco ACI/APIC, and Cisco DNA (“Requested Code”); and (2) identify which Cisco products or systems use the Requested Code per NetSocket’s Interrogatory No. 6. I.