Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Howlink Global LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00040 (E.D. Tex. May 30, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00040, Dkt. No. 216
Decided
May 30, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 165 SEALED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 1: NON-INFRINGEMENT DUE TO THE APPLICATION OF THE FESTO BAR. IT IS RECOMMENDED the Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Due to Application of the Festo Bar (D…
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ 1 Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1: Non- infringement Due to Application of the Festo Bar (Dkt. No. 165). For the following reasons, the motion should be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On February 3, 2022, Howlink filed suit against Defendants alleging that they infringe U.S. Patent Nos . 8,630,279 (the “’ 279 Patent”), RE46,415 (the “’415 Patent”), and 9,596,576 (the “’576 Patent” ). Since filing this suit, Howlink has decided it no longer assert s the ’415 Patent,2 and the ’576 Patent.