Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. June 13, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 604
Decided
June 13, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 597 (Motion(s)597 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Renewed Motion to Stay (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 597.) In the Motion, Samsung argues that the Court should stay this case pending final resolution of the inter partes review (“IPR”) of the asserted patents. ( Id.) Having considered the Motion and the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. I.