Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Communication Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00444 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00444, Dkt. No. 150
Decided
May 29, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 88 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO RE-DESIGNATE PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 19 OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER (DKT. NO. 38), 146 MOTION to Dismiss (Motion(s)146, 88 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Lift Stay and Dismiss Case with Prejudice (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 146.) In the Motion, Samsung moves the Court to (a) lift the stay entered in this case, (b) either disregard or deny Plaintiff Communication Technologies, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Re-Designate Pursuant to Paragraph 19 of the Protective Order (the “Motion to Re-Designate”) (Dkt. No.