Whirlpool Corporation v. Shenzhen Lujian Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2022)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation’s (“Whirlpool”) Motion for Leave to Effect Alternative Service and Extension of Time to Serve (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 4). Having considered the Motion and accompany exhibits and declarations and for t he reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On October 25, 2021, Whirlpool filed the present suit against Defendant Shenzhen Lujian Technology Co., Ltd. (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 1).