Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GreatGigz Solutions, LLC v. East Texas Border Health Clinic d/b/a Genesis PrimeCare, No. 2:21-cv-00370 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00370, Dkt. No. 29
Decided
June 28, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant East Texas Border Health Clinic d/b/a Genesis Primecare’s (“Genesis”) Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 8). In the Motion, Genesis requests that the Court dismiss the above -captioned case because the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,662,194 (the “’194 Patent”), 9,760,864 (the “’864 Patent”), 10,096,000 (the “’000 Patent”), and 7,490,086 (the “’086 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”) recite patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (Dkt. No. 1 at 13, 18, 22, 26).