Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

BoxCast Inc. v. Resi Media LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00217 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00217, Dkt. No. 144
Decided
March 24, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 42 SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by BoxCast Inc
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff BoxCast Inc.’s (“BoxCast”) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 42). Having considered the Motion, the briefing and the supporting declarations and argument, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED.1 I. BACKGROUND On June 16, 2021, BoxCast filed this case against Resi alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,686,574 (the “ʼ574 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 10,154,317 (the “ʼ317 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”) .2 (Dkt. No. 1).