Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Stingray IP Solutions, LLC v. Legrand et al, No. 2:21-cv-00202 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2022)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00202, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
April 14, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Stingray IP Solutions, LLC, (“Stingray”) alleges infringement by Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon.com Services LLC (together, “Amazon”) of eight patents in two different proceedings. See Dkt. No. 74 at 1. One of the proceedings between Stingray and Amazon is Case No. 2:21- cv- 00193-JRG, which was consolidated for pretri al purposes under lead Case No. 2:21- cv- 00201-JRG. The other proceeding between Stingray and Amazon is Case No. 2:21- cv- 00194-JRG, which was similarly consolidated for pretrial purposes under lead Case No. 2 / 23 2:21-cv-00202-JRG.