Arigna Technology Limited v. Porsche AG et al, No. 2:21-cv-00173 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2023)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Bayerische Moteren Werke AG’s (“ BMW”) Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 64.) In the Motion, BMW moves this Court to dismiss Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited’s (“Arigna”) First Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), 12( b)(6), and 12(b)(7). Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED. Also before the Court is Defendant BMW’s Motion for Protective Order. (Dkt. No.