Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Koninklijke Kpn N.V. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al, No. 2:21-cv-00113 (E.D. Tex. June 15, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00113, Dkt. No. 318
Decided
June 15, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***UNSEALED PER ORDER # 319*** MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 276 Motion for an Exceptional Case Finding and Fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and an Award of Expert Fees
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Koninklijke KPN N.V.’s (“KPN”) Motion for an Exceptional Case Finding and Fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and an Award of Expert Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 276.) In the Motion, KPN moves the Court to find that this case is exceptional, award KPN its attorneys’ fees, and award KPN its expert costs. Having considered the Motion, associated briefing, case record, and relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED for the reasons set forth below. I.