Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Longhorn HD LLC. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00099 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00099, Dkt. No. 42
Decided
September 16, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 16). Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On March 19, 2021, Plaintiff Longhorn HD LLC (“LHD” or “Longhorn”) filed this five- patent case against Juniper accusing certain Juniper security gateways of infringing LHD’s patents; to-wit: U.S. Patent No.