Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00080 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2021)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00080, Dkt. No. 164
Decided
November 16, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
60 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On November 2, 2021, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in in U .S. Patent No. 7,103,794 (“the ’794 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,646,014 (“the ’014 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,656,419 (“the ’419 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 9,402,098 (“the ’098 Patent” ), and U.S. Patent No. 10,911,938 (“the ’938 Patent”) . Having reviewed the arguments made by the Parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos.