Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00382 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 15, 2021)

Dismissed
Motion to Dismiss § 101 Eligibility
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00382, Dkt. No. 142
Decided
September 15, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Court finds that Pelotons Motion to Dismiss should be and hereby is GRANTED but without prejudice. It is therefore ORDERED that all claims in the above-captioned matter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Cle…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Peloton Interactive, Inc.’s (“Peloton”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) and Brief in Support of Same (the “Motion to Dismiss”). (Dkt. No. 27). Having considered the parties’ briefing and oral arguments at the hearing held on August 19, 2021 (Dkt. No. 136), and for the reasons stated herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED and Plaintiff Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. (“Mad Dogg”) Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND a.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case