Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Unicorn Energy GmbH v. Tesla, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00338 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2021)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00338, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
September 3, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Tesla, Inc.’s (“Tesla”) Amended Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 37). Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and for the r easons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On October 26, 2020, Plaintiff Unicorn Energy GMBH (“Unicorn”) filed this single-patent case against Tesla accusing Tesla’s Powerpack of infringing Unicorn’s patent, U.S. Patent No.