Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Garrity Power Services LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al, No. 2:20-cv-00269 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00269, Dkt. No. 132
Decided
September 24, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Garrity Power Services LLC’s (“Garrity”) Motion to Compel Production of Damages Documents (the “Motion to Compel”). (Dkt. No. 117). Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (“SEA”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed the responsive briefing. (Dkt. No. 120). Having considered the Motion to Compel and subsequent briefing, the Court is of the opinion that Garrity’s Motion to Compel should be DENIED. I.