Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Neodron Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation; Panasonic Corporation OF North America, No. 2:20-cv-00241 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2021)

Granted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00241, Dkt. No. 72
Decided
September 28, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
8/2021. (klc, )ORDER granting 71 Motion to Dismiss. It is further ORDERED that each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Neodron, Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant s Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (“Defendants”) (together with Plaintiff , the “Parties”) . (Dkt. No. 71.) Having considered the Motion, and in light of its joint nature, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error