Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oyster Optics, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.,, No. 2:20-cv-00211 (E.D. Tex. May 4, 2021)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00211, Dkt. No. 73
Decided
May 4, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 61) filed by Plaintiff Oyster Optics, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Oyster”), the Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 62) filed by Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Cisco”), and Plaintiff’s Reply (Dkt. No. 63). On April 23, 2021, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of disputed terms in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,665,500, 8,913,898, and 10,205,516.