Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Scorpcast, LLC dba HaulStars v. Boutique Media, No. 2:20-cv-00193 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 22, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00193, Dkt. No. 76
Decided
December 22, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Inter Partes Review, filed by Defendants Boutique Media Pty Ltd, All 4 Heath SRL, Oanasun Entertainment SRL, 9090-7247 Québec Inc. d /b/a KB Productions, Bravomax Services Limited, and Manica Media SL (collectively, the “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 70. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Scorpcast, LLC d/b/a Haulstars sued the Defendants1 individually, asserting the same three claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,965,780 (“the ’780 patent”) against each of them.2 See e.g., Dkt. No. 5 at 5.