Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Luminati Networks Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00188 (E.D. Tex. July 23, 2021)

Granted in Part
Discovery Contentions Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00188, Dkt. No. 119
Decided
July 23, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 99 Opposed SEALED MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANT'S WITNESSES MESSRS. BINHAS AND DANIEL filed by Luminati Networks Ltd., 100 Opposed SEALED MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO SUPPLEMENT INTERROGATORY RESPONSES, PROD…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On July 22, 2021, the Court held a hearing regarding four motions in the above captioned matter. The first motion is Defendant NetNut Ltd.’s Motion to Strike Infringement Contentions . Dkt. No. 83. The second motion is the Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Under P.R. 3- 6(b) filed by Plaintiff Luminati Networks Ltd., now known as Bright Data Ltd. Dkt. No. 87. The third motion is Luminati’s Opposed Motion to Compel Depositions of Defendant’s Witnesses Messrs. Binhas and Daniel (“Motion to Depose”). Dkt. No. 99.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case