Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Association, No. 2:20-cv-00115 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00115, Dkt. No. 45
Decided
April 21, 2020
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 19 Defendant's Motion to Transfer; Granting 30 Defendant's Administrative Motion for Leave to File Response; and Overruling 28 Plaintiff's Objection to Reply Evidence. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4…
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE; AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE Docket Nos. 19, 28, 30 The instant case is a patent declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff Mitek Systems, Inc. seeks a declaration that it does not infringe four patents (the ‘779, ‘517, ‘090, and ‘571 patents) held by Defendant United States Automobile Association (“USAA”).