Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Monarch Networking Solutions LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00015 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2021)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00015, Dkt. No. 128
Decided
January 7, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
94 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On November 20, 2020, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms within in Uni ted States Patent Nos. 8,451,844 (the “’844 Patent”); 8,451,845 (the “’845 Patent”); 9,019,965 (the “’965 Patent”); and 8,130,775 (the “’775 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”). Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim cons truction briefing (Dkt. Nos.