Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:20-cv-00004 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00004, Dkt. No. 131
Decided
September 18, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
52 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Joe Andrew Salazar (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 97, filed on June 10, 2020), 1 the response of AT&T Mobility LLC ; Sprint/United Management Company; T- Mobile USA, Inc.; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ; HTC Corporation; and HTC America, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) ( Dkt. No. 102, filed on June 24, 2020), and Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 103, filed on July 1, 2020) and supplemental brief (Dkt. No. 112, filed on July 30, 2020).