Simo Holdings, Inc. et al v. Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited et al, No. 2:20-cv-00003 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited’s (“Hong Kong uCloudlink”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 26) and Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 27). Having considered both Motions, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that such Motions should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On January 6, 2020, Plaintiffs SIMO Holdings, Inc. (“SIMO”), Skyroam, Inc. (“Skyroam”), and Shenzhen Skyroam Technology Co., Ltd.