Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bright Data Ltd. v. code200, UAB et al, No. 2:19-cv-00396 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00396, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
February 9, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Code200, UAB; Oxysales, UAB; Metacluster LT, UAB (collectively, “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 37.) Having considered the Motion, the related briefing, and the relevant authority, the Court is of the opinion that it should be DENIED. Also before the Court are Defendants Oxysales, UAB and Metacluster LT, UAB’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) and Code200, UAB’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No.