Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Snik LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00387 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00387, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
November 6, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Plaintiff Snik LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Snik”) (Dkt. No. 43, filed on August 26 , 2020 ), the response of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electron ics America, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Samsung”) (Dkt. No. 54, filed on September 30, 2020), and the reply of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 58, filed on October 7, 2020). The Court held a claim construction hearing on October 23, 2020 (see Dkt. No. 61).