Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Barkan Wireless IP Holdings, L.P. v. Sprint Corporation et al, No. 2:19-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00336, Dkt. No. 144
Decided
October 26, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
66 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 114) filed by Plaintiff Barkan Wireless IP Holdings, L.P. (“Plaintiff” or “Barkan”). Also before the Court is the Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 129) filed by Defendants Sprint Communications Company, L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., (collectively, “Sprint”), and CommScope Technologies LLC (“CommScope”) ( all, collectively, “Defendant s”) as well as Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 131).