Arbor Global Strategies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2020)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
The Magistrate Judge previously entered his Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) Dkt. No. 31), which recommended denying Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.’s (together, “Samsung”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing ( “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 22). Samsung has now filed an Objection to that R&R (“Objection”). (Dkt. No. 36) After consideration of the briefing on Samsung’s Motion, the R&R, a nd Samsung’s Objection, the Court concludes that the objections are without sufficient merit.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error