Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00311 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 16, 2021)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00311, Dkt. No. 193
Decided
February 16, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 122 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Strike Portions of Report of Dr. Jose Zagal
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

B efore the Court is the Plaintiff GREE, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report of Dr. Jose Zagal (Dkt. No. 122). After consideration, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. INTRODUCTION On September 16, 2019, GREE filed a complaint against Defendant Supercell Oy alleging Supercell’s products Clash of Clans, Clash Royale, and Hay Day infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 9,079,107 (the “’107 Patent”) and 9,561,439 (the “’439 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). (Dkt. No. 1).