Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Corydoras Technologies, LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00304 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00304, Dkt. No. 49
Decided
March 16, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 42 Opposed MOTION to Stay CLAIMS PENDING RESOLUTION OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion to Stay Claims Pending Resolution of Declaratory Judgment Action in the Western District of Texas (“Motion to Stay”), which was filed by Defendant Best Buy Co., Inc. and Defendant Best Buy Stores, L.P. (“Best Buy”). Dkt. No. 42. This case involves claims of infringement by Plaintiff Corydoras Technologies, LLC (“Corydoras”) against Best Buy involving accused products made by nine different manufacturers, including Amazon, Microsoft, Dell, Alienware, HP, Acer, Google, Nokia and BLU.