Gigamon Inc. v. Apcon, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00300 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2022)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apcon, Inc.’s (“Apcon”) Motion for Attorney s’ Fees Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 (the “Motion”) (Dkt. No. 321). Having considered the Motion and the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Gigamon Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Gigamon”) filed suit against Defendant Apcon, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apcon”), alleging t hat Apcon’s Series 3000 and Series 4000 products (the “Accused Products”) infringe U.S. Patent Nos.