Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2020)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
March 24, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

B efore the Court are two motions by Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. ( collectively, “Samsung” or “Defendants”): (1) Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Uniloc’s Appeal of a Closely Related Case, Pending Inter Partes Reviews of the Patent at Issue, and Pending Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss This Case (“Motion to Stay”) (Dkt. No. 37) and (2) Motion for Oral Hearing (Dkt. No. 49) (collectively, the “Motions”). After consideration, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Stay and Motion for Oral Hearing. I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error