Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00237 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00237, Dkt. No. 115
Decided
September 24, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - denying 103 Motion to Strike
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Defendant’s Amended Invalidity Contentions, filed by Plaintiff GREE, Inc. Dkt. No. 103. After consideration, the Court DENIES GREE’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND On June 24, 2019, GREE filed this case against Defendant Supercell Oy claiming that Supercell’s “Clash Royale” game infringed U.S. Patent No. 10,328,346 (“the ’346 Patent ”), as well as one other patent.