Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00225 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2021)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00225, Dkt. No. 235
Decided
January 13, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.’s (“Cisco”) Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 10,270,535, No. 10,033,465, and No. 10,461,866 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 221.) Having considered the Motion and the related briefing, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (“Ramot”) alleges Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) infringes U.S. Patent No. 10,270,535 (the “’535 Patent”); U.S. Patent No.