Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Solas Oled Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00152 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2021)

Denied
JMOL / Post-Trial Non-Infringement Infringement Willfulness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00152, Dkt. No. 407
Decided
October 25, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 374 SEALED PATENT MOTION Defendants Rule 59 Motion for New Trial filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 371 SEALED PATENT MOTION Defendants Rule …
Length
48 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following motions filed by Defendants Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (“SDC”), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”), and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”) (collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”): 1. Defendants’ Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Non-Infringement, No Willful Infringement, and Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of the ’311 Patent (the “’311 JMOL Motion”) (Dkt. No. 371); 2.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case