Kaifi LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00138 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 31, 2020, the Court held a hearing via video teleconferencing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 6,922,728 (“the ’728 Patent”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the P arties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. (See Dkt. Nos. 62, 67, 68.) The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings about the extrin sic evidence. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005); see also Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v.