Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Quest Nettech Corporation v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00118 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00118, Dkt. No. 53
Decided
November 27, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Transfer Venue U nder 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 20.) In the Motion, Apple requests that this Court transfer the above-captioned case under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a) from the Eastern District of Texas to the Northern District of California . Having considered the Motion and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. The Asserted Patent This case involves one patent—United States No.