Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Apicore US LLC et al v. Beloteca, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00077 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00077, Dkt. No. 100
Decided
April 17, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER re 21 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Improper Venue and Prior Pending Action filed by Beloteca, Inc
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Beloteca, Inc’s (“Beloteca”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, and Prior Pending Action (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 21.) Having considered the Motion and the rele vant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART to the extent set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Apicore US LLC (“Apicore”) owns U.S. Patent Nos. 8,969,616 (the “ ’616 Patent”) and 9,353,050 (the “ ’050 Patent”) (collectively, the “ Asserted Patents”). (Dkt. No.