Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

RevoLaze LLC v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00043 (E.D. Tex. May 6, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00043, Dkt. No. 163
Decided
May 6, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ANSWER
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff RevoLaze LLC’s (“RevoLaze”) Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 126.) In the Motion, RevoLaze seeks leave to amend its infringement contentions to (1) incorporate information produced by Flynn Enterprises (the “Flynn Amendment”); (2) allege that the presumption of infringement applies to all products with a “reasonable likelihood of infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 295” ; and (3) add evidence specific to two products named in the complaint. ( Id.