Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:18-cv-00506 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2020)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
On November 25, 2019, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 7,190,408 (“the ’408 Patent”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the Parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. (See Dkt. Nos. 33, 37, 41.) The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings about the extrinsic evidence. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005); see also Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error