Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Luminati Networks Ltd. v. BI Science Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00483 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00483, Dkt. No. 82
Decided
May 13, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 36 SEALED MOTION TO DISMISS, AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE filed by BI Science Inc., BI Science (2009) Ltd., 22 SEALED PATENT MOTION for Early Venue Discovery filed by Luminati Networks Ltd…
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant BIScience Inc.’s (“BIScience”) Motion to Dismiss, and in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue (the “First Motion to Dismiss”). (Dkt. No. 15.) Additionally, before the Court is BIScience’s Second Motion to Dismiss, and in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue (the “Second Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 36), as well as Plaintiff Luminati Networks Ltd.’s (“Luminati”) Motion to Strike Portions of Defendant’s Second Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion to Strike”) (Dkt. No. 40).