Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:18-cv-00439 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2019)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00439, Dkt. No. 94
Decided
September 6, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Harris Corporation’s (“Harris”) Motion to Amend P.R. 3- 1 Infringement Contentions (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 88.) Having considered the Motion and its briefing, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED for the reasons set forth below. I. BACKGROUND On October 24, 2018, Harris filed this suit against Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA Inc., and Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (collectively “Huawei”). (Dkt. No.